Peter, sorry. I didn't actually read this patch yet (and a lot of previous
emails). Will try tomorrow, I am not even sure I understand the problem(s)
correctly. But let me ask one question anyway,
On 12/13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ __wait_on_bit(wait_queue_head_t *wq, str
> do {
> prepare_to_wait(wq, &q->wait, mode);
> if (test_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags))
> - ret = (*action)(&q->key);
> + ret = (*action)(&q->key, mode);
And every action() should check signal_pending_state()...
So why we can't change __wait_on_bit/etc instead and remove all the signal-
pending checks from the callbacks? It seems that we can just check
signal_pending_state() before prepare_to_wait(). Or perhaps we can add
another helper which acts like prepare_to_wait_event().
Yes, some callers want -EINTR, some -ERESTARTSYS, but this shouldn't be a
problem.
And sorry if this was already discussed, another case when I am trying to
return to lkml with a lot of unread emails.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
