On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 03:26PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 07:41 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 01:41PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2015 08:39 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> >>> Request_irq() should be _after_ h/w programming, otherwise an
> >>> interrupt could be triggered and in-progress before the h/w has been
> >>> setup.
> >>
> >> Slight misunderstanding. My fault; I should have been more explicit.
> >>
> >> 1. Any setup necessary for the isr not to be confused and misdirect
> >> spurious
> >> interrupts (or hang) should be before installing the isr with
> >> request_irq()
> >> None of this code should trigger an interrupt.
> >> 2. Clear pending interrupts
> >> 3. Install the isr with request_irq()
> >> 4. Enable interrupts
> >
> > Isn't that what the startup function is doing now - more or less. I
> > think 3 and 4 are swapped to release the lock and then do the
> > request_irq, but I believe that should be OK.
> > The startup function configures the HW. Clears the ISR. Enables the
> > intended IRQs and then does the request_irq call.
>
> If the driver enables interrupts before installing the isr with request_irq()
> and an interrupt occurs there will the no handler to catch it and EOI the
> device.
Really? Shouldn't the IRQ be masked in the interrupt controller until
everything is in place?
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
