On 12/14/2015 5:33 PM, Andy Green wrote: > Hi... looks good, just some small general comments. > > On 15 December 2015 at 06:42, Joshua Henderson > <joshua.hender...@microchip.com> wrote: > > From: Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistir...@microchip.com> > > > > This driver supports the SDHCI host controller found on a PIC32. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistir...@microchip.com> > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Henderson <joshua.hender...@microchip.com> > > Cc: Ralf Baechle <r...@linux-mips.org> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 11 ++ > > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pic32.c | 291 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 303 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pic32.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig index > > 1dee533..1a3a42b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > > @@ -785,3 +785,14 @@ config MMC_MTK > > If you have a machine with a integrated SD/MMC card reader, say Y > > or M > here. > > This is needed if support for any SD/SDIO/MMC devices is required. > > If unsure, say N. > > + > > +config MMC_SDHCI_MICROCHIP_PIC32 > > + tristate "Microchip PIC32MZDA SDHCI support" > > + depends on MMC_SDHCI && PIC32MZDA > > + help > > + This selects the Secure Digital Host Controller Interface (SDHCI) > > + for PIC32MZDA platform. > > + > > + If you have a controller with this interface, say Y or M here. > > + > > + If unsure, say N. > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile > > index 3595f83..af918d2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile > > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_BCM2835) += sdhci- > bcm2835.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IPROC) += sdhci-iproc.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_MSM) += sdhci-msm.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ST) += sdhci-st.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_MICROCHIP_PIC32) += sdhci-pic32.o > > > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_CB710_DEBUG),y) > > CFLAGS-cb710-mmc += -DDEBUG > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pic32.c > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pic32.c new file mode 100644 index > > 0000000..b7d7da2 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pic32.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ > > +/* > > + * Support of SDHCI platform devices for Microchip PIC32. > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2015 Microchip > > + * Andrei Pistirica, Paul Thacker > > + * > > + * Inspired by sdhci-pltfm.c > > + * > > + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public > > + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any > > + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied. > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/clk.h> > > +#include <linux/delay.h> > > +#include <linux/highmem.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > > +#include <linux/irq.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > +#include <linux/pm.h> > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/mmc/host.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include "sdhci.h" > > +#include <linux/platform_data/sdhci-pic32.h> > > + > > +#define SDH_SHARED_BUS_CTRL 0x000000E0 > > +#define SDH_SHARED_BUS_NR_CLK_PINS_MASK 0x7 > > +#define SDH_SHARED_BUS_NR_IRQ_PINS_MASK 0x30 > > +#define SDH_SHARED_BUS_CLK_PINS 0x10 > > +#define SDH_SHARED_BUS_IRQ_PINS 0x14 > > +#define SDH_CAPS_SDH_SLOT_TYPE_MASK 0xC0000000 > > +#define SDH_SLOT_TYPE_REMOVABLE 0x0 > > +#define SDH_SLOT_TYPE_EMBEDDED 0x1 > > +#define SDH_SLOT_TYPE_SHARED_BUS 0x2 > > +#define SDHCI_CTRL_CDSSEL 0x80 > > +#define SDHCI_CTRL_CDTLVL 0x40 > > + > > +#define ADMA_FIFO_RD_THSHLD 512 > > +#define ADMA_FIFO_WR_THSHLD 512 > > + > > +#define DEV_NAME "pic32-sdhci" > > Is there any point defining this when it only has one use in the driver?
Ack. Will remove. > > > +struct pic32_sdhci_pdata { > > + struct platform_device *pdev; > > + struct clk *sys_clk; > > + struct clk *base_clk; > > +}; > > + > > +static unsigned int pic32_sdhci_get_max_clock(struct sdhci_host > > +*host) { > > + struct pic32_sdhci_pdata *sdhci_pdata = sdhci_priv(host); > > + > > + return clk_get_rate(sdhci_pdata->base_clk); > > +} > > + > > +static void pic32_sdhci_set_bus_width(struct sdhci_host *host, int > > +width) { > > + u8 ctrl; > > + > > + ctrl = sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > + if (width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8) { > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_4BITBUS; > > + if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300) > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_8BITBUS; > > + } else { > > + if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300) > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_8BITBUS; > > + if (width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4) > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_4BITBUS; > > + else > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_4BITBUS; > > + } > > + /* > > + * SDHCI will not work if JTAG is not Connected.As a workaround fix, > > + * set Card Detect Signal Selection bit in SDHCI Host Control > > + * register and clear Card Detect Test Level bit in SDHCI Host > > + * Control register. > > + */ > > Isn't this a clearer explanation, if I understood? > > "Without setting CD select and test bits now, SDHCI only works with JTAG > connected." > > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_CDTLVL; > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_CDSSEL; > > + sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > Also... is that a feature of the SDHCI IP or this particular chip's > implementation > of it? I guess if there is only one implementation right now that has that > restriction worry about making it selectable later. But if the > implementation, it > might make sense to also put the affected implementation name in the > comment to make it clear. This is a chip errata. Having JTAG connected masks the problem, but is otherwise irrelevant. Comment will be changed to: "CD select and test bits must be set for errata workaround." > > > +} > > + > > +static unsigned int pic32_sdhci_get_ro(struct sdhci_host *host) { > > + /* > > + * The SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT bit is unstable on current hardware so we > > + * can't depend on its value in any way. > > + */ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct sdhci_ops pic32_sdhci_ops = { > > + .get_max_clock = pic32_sdhci_get_max_clock, > > + .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock, > > + .set_bus_width = pic32_sdhci_set_bus_width, > > + .reset = sdhci_reset, > > + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling, > > + .get_ro = pic32_sdhci_get_ro, > > +}; > > + > > +static void pic32_sdhci_shared_bus(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + u32 bus = readl(host->ioaddr + SDH_SHARED_BUS_CTRL); > > + u32 clk_pins = (bus & SDH_SHARED_BUS_NR_CLK_PINS_MASK) >> 0; > > + u32 irq_pins = (bus & SDH_SHARED_BUS_NR_IRQ_PINS_MASK) >> 4; > > + > > + /* select first clock */ > > + if (clk_pins & 0x1) > > BIT(0)? Also a couple of lines down. > > > + bus |= (0x1 << SDH_SHARED_BUS_CLK_PINS); > > I know it's popular but there is no meaning or use in "0x1" where you could > just > say "1". > > > + /* select first interrupt */ > > + if (irq_pins & 0x1) > > + bus |= (0x1 << SDH_SHARED_BUS_IRQ_PINS); > > As above. Ack. Will change. > > > + writel(bus, host->ioaddr + SDH_SHARED_BUS_CTRL); } > > + > > +static int pic32_sdhci_probe_platform(struct platform_device *pdev, > > + struct pic32_sdhci_pdata *pdata) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + u32 caps_slot_type; > > + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + > > + /* Check card slot connected on shared bus. */ > > + host->caps = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES); > > + caps_slot_type = (host->caps & SDH_CAPS_SDH_SLOT_TYPE_MASK) >> > 30; > > + if (caps_slot_type == SDH_SLOT_TYPE_SHARED_BUS) > > + pic32_sdhci_shared_bus(pdev); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int pic32_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + struct sdhci_host *host; > > + struct resource *iomem; > > + struct pic32_sdhci_pdata *sdhci_pdata; > > + struct pic32_sdhci_platform_data *plat_data; > > + unsigned int clk_rate = 0; > > + int ret; > > + struct pinctrl *pinctrl; > > It's hardly critical but for extra gold star arranging local vars in length > order > (longest first) is nice. Ack. > > > + > > + host = sdhci_alloc_host(dev, sizeof(*sdhci_pdata)); > > + if (IS_ERR(host)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(host); > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot allocate memory for sdhci\n"); > > + goto err; > > + } > > + > > + sdhci_pdata = sdhci_priv(host); > > + sdhci_pdata->pdev = pdev; > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host); > > + > > + iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > + host->ioaddr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, iomem); > > + if (IS_ERR(host->ioaddr)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(host->ioaddr); > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to map iomem: %d\n", ret); > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + plat_data = pdev->dev.platform_data; > > + if (plat_data && plat_data->setup_dma) { > > + ret = plat_data->setup_dma(ADMA_FIFO_RD_THSHLD, > > + ADMA_FIFO_WR_THSHLD); > > + if (ret) > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev); > > + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(pinctrl); > > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No pinctrl provided %d\n", ret); > > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + host->ops = &pic32_sdhci_ops; > > + host->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > + > > + sdhci_pdata->sys_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sys_clk"); > > + if (IS_ERR(sdhci_pdata->sys_clk)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(sdhci_pdata->sys_clk); > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error getting clock\n"); > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + /* Enable clock when available! */ > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(sdhci_pdata->sys_clk); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Error enabling clock\n"); > > Shouldn't this be dev_err()? You don't survive not having the clock in the > stanza > above. So if you have the clock, you would want to know if it didn't deal > with > the clk_prepare_enable(). > > The comment 4 lines above is also wrong if so. Ack. > > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + /* SDH CLK enable */ > > + sdhci_pdata->base_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "base_clk"); > > + if (IS_ERR(sdhci_pdata->base_clk)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(sdhci_pdata->base_clk); > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error getting clock\n"); > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + /* Enable clock when available! */ > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(sdhci_pdata->base_clk); > > Again the comment seems wrong. Ack. > > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Error enabling clock\n"); > > And if I understood it, dev_err() needed. Ack. > > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sdhci_pdata->base_clk); > > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "base clock at: %u\n", clk_rate); > > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sdhci_pdata->sys_clk); > > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "sys clock at: %u\n", clk_rate); > > + > > + host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V; > > + > > Probably can lose the blank line. Ack. > > > + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT; > > + > > + ret = mmc_of_parse(host->mmc); > > + if (ret) > > + goto err_host; > > + > > + ret = pic32_sdhci_probe_platform(pdev, sdhci_pdata); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe platform!\n"); > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + ret = sdhci_add_host(host); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "error adding host\n"); > > + goto err_host; > > + } > > + > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Successfully added sdhci host\n"); > > + return 0; > > + > > +err_host: > > + sdhci_free_host(host); > > +err: > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pic32-sdhci probe failed: %d\n", ret); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int pic32_sdhci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + struct pic32_sdhci_pdata *sdhci_pdata = sdhci_priv(host); > > + int dead = 0; > > + u32 scratch; > > + > > + scratch = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS); > > + if (scratch == (u32)-1) > > Since it's not actually related to signed, (u32)~0 might be clearer. Ack. > > > + dead = 1; > > + > > + sdhci_remove_host(host, dead); > > You could get rid of "dead" and have > > sdhci_remove_host(host, scratch == (u32)~0); Ack. > > > + clk_disable_unprepare(sdhci_pdata->base_clk); > > + clk_disable_unprepare(sdhci_pdata->sys_clk); > > + sdhci_free_host(host); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id pic32_sdhci_id_table[] = { > > + { .compatible = "microchip,pic32mzda-sdhci" }, > > + {} > > +}; > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pic32_sdhci_id_table); > > + > > +static struct platform_driver pic32_sdhci_driver = { > > + .driver = { > > + .name = DEV_NAME, > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pic32_sdhci_id_table), > > + }, > > + .probe = pic32_sdhci_probe, > > + .remove = pic32_sdhci_remove, > > +}; > > + > > +module_platform_driver(pic32_sdhci_driver); > > + > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Microchip PIC32 SDHCI driver"); > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pistirica Sorin Andrei & Sandeep Sheriker"); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > -- > > 1.7.9.5 > > Thanks, Paul N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a��� 0��h���i