On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:14:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:32:27PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * VMD h/w converts posted config writes to non-posted. The read-back in 
> > this
> > + * function forces the completion so it returns only after the config 
> > space was
> > + * written, as expected.
> 
> This comment sounds backwards:
> 
>   posted writes don't wait for completion
>   non-posted writes do wait for completion
> 
> If the hardware converts to non-posted writes, you shouldn't need a
> read-back.  It seems like you would need the read-back if the hardware
> converted non-posted to posted.

Oops, the comment has it backwards. Non-posted config writes become
posted memory write requests with this h/w.
 
> Seems like it might be nice to have something in dmesg that would connect
> this PCI device to the new PCI domain.  It's a new, unusual topology and a
> hint might help everybody understand what's going on.

Sounds good, will add.

In addition that, I'd like to mention this patch links a new domain's
root bus kobject under the VMD end-point's so the sysfs hierarchy captures
this as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to