On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 08:27:52AM +0100, Martin Sperl wrote: > > > On 18.12.2015, at 07:05, Vinod Koul <vinod.k...@intel.com> wrote:
> > Most of this part is common with the cyclic and seems copy paste. Can we > > use common routine to do common work please > > I agree - can have a look - the big question is: how would I document the > individual changes by Gellert Weisz and myself correctly? > * just a single patch with an attribution tag (which?) or just a commit > message? > * Patchset with 2 patches: the original by Gellert Weisz (this) > plus the modification to consolidate the code above? There are lot of patches were original contributors moved away. In the change log please say original written by <> and modified for upstream by you. That way you retain credit for original changes done Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
