On Dec 15 2006 15:56, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >
>> > > Not in simple cases.
>> > >
>> > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like
>> > > (3 * i) + (2 * j)
>> >
>> > I would just write it as:
>> > 3 * i + 2 * j
>>
>> So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write
>> for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2)
>> because I prefer the grouping in
>> for (i=0; i<10; i+=2)
>>
>
> Would you write:
>
> i+=2;
>
> outside the loop? If not then it is better to keep style consistent
> and not use condensed form in loops either.
Don't you all even think about leaving the whitespace away in the wrong
place, otherwise the kernel is likely to become an entry for IOCCC.
-`J'
--
