On 12/18/2015 03:21 AM, Anton Wuerfel wrote:
> This patch fixes checkpatch warnings about unnecessary else blocks after
> return statements.
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
See note below.
> Signed-off-by: Anton Würfel <anton.wuer...@fau.de>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Raffeck <phillip.raff...@fau.de>
> CC: linux-ker...@i4.cs.fau.de
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
> index 7f9f245..09157fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
> @@ -805,10 +805,10 @@ static int pci_netmos_9900_numports(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> pi = (c & 0xff);
>
> - if (pi == 2) {
> + if (pi == 2)
> return 1;
> - } else if ((pi == 0) &&
> - (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_NETMOS_9900)) {
> +
> + if ((pi == 0) && (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_NETMOS_9900)) {
> /* two possibilities: 0x30ps encodes number of parallel and
> * serial ports, or 0x1000 indicates *something*. This is not
> * immediately obvious, since the 2s1p+4s configuration seems
checkpatch missed this comment style because it's what netdev uses.
Not a problem, though. We're not quite so formal here.
> @@ -816,12 +816,11 @@ static int pci_netmos_9900_numports(struct pci_dev *dev)
> * advertising the same function 3 as the 4s+2s1p config.
> */
> sub_serports = dev->subsystem_device & 0xf;
> - if (sub_serports > 0) {
> + if (sub_serports > 0)
> return sub_serports;
> - } else {
> - dev_err(&dev->dev, "NetMos/Mostech serial driver
> ignoring port on ambiguous config.\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> +
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "NetMos/Mostech serial driver ignoring port
> on ambiguous config.\n");
> + return 0;
> }
>
> moan_device("unknown NetMos/Mostech program interface", dev);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
