On 12/12/06, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:03:50PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > there are a plethora of headers that cannot be included straight due > to the usage of __ types (like __u32) without first including > linux/types.h ... so the question is, should all of these headers be > fixed to properly pull in linux/types.h first or are users expected to > "just know" the correct order of headers ? in my mind, pretty much > every header is fair game for straight "#include <header>" usage and > requiring a list of headers to be pulled in properly is ignoring the > problem ...Yes, they should all be fixed to #include <linux/types.h>.
thanks, mondo patch attached :) -mike
linux-include-types-header.patch
Description: Binary data