> -----Original Message-----
> From: He YunLei [mailto:heyun...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 8:35 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: 'Jaegeuk Kim'; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree 
> entries
> 
> On 2015/12/22 13:20, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> >
> > We should update &total_zombie_tree whenever removing unreferenced
> > extent tree during shrinking:
> > - f2fs_shrink_extent_tree
> > if (!atomic_read(&et->refcount)) {
> >     ...
> >     atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> >     atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
> >     ...
> > }
> >
> > Other parts look good to me. :)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2...@samsung.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:39 AM
> >> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> >> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> >> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree 
> >> entries
> >>
> >> If there is no candidates for shrinking slab entries, we don't need to 
> >> traverse
> >> any trees at all.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >>   fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h         |  1 +
> >>   fs/f2fs/shrinker.c     |  2 +-
> >>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> >> index 0e97d6af..32693af 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> >> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct 
> >> inode *inode)
> >>            atomic_set(&et->refcount, 0);
> >>            et->count = 0;
> >>            atomic_inc(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> >> +  } else {
> >> +          atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
> >>    }
> >>    atomic_inc(&et->refcount);
> >>    up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> >> @@ -547,10 +549,14 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct 
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
> >> nr_shrink)
> >>    unsigned int found;
> >>    unsigned int node_cnt = 0, tree_cnt = 0;
> >>    int remained;
> >> +  bool do_free = false;
> >>
> >>    if (!test_opt(sbi, EXTENT_CACHE))
> >>            return 0;
> >>
> >> +  if (!atomic_read(&sbi->total_zombie_tree))
> >> +          goto free_node;
> >> +
> >>    if (!down_write_trylock(&sbi->extent_tree_lock))
> >>            goto out;
> >>
> >> @@ -580,6 +586,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct 
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
> >> nr_shrink)
> >>    }
> >>    up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> >>
> >> +free_node:
> >>    /* 2. remove LRU extent entries */
> >>    if (!down_write_trylock(&sbi->extent_tree_lock))
> >>            goto out;
> >> @@ -591,9 +598,13 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct 
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
> >> nr_shrink)
> >>            if (!remained--)
> >>                    break;
> >>            list_del_init(&en->list);
> >> +          do_free = true;
> >>    }
> >>    spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
> >>
> >> +  if (do_free == false)
> >> +          goto unlock_out;
> >> +
> >>    /*
> >>     * reset ino for searching victims from beginning of global extent tree.
> >>     */
> >> @@ -651,6 +662,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> >>
> >>    if (inode->i_nlink && !is_bad_inode(inode) && et->count) {
> >>            atomic_dec(&et->refcount);
> >> +          atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
> >>            return;
> >>    }
> Hi,all
>       here, sbi->total_ext_tree-- also should change to
>       atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);

Yunlei,

Seems not right.

Thanks,

> Thanks,
> 
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> index a7f6191..90fb970 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >> @@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> >>    struct list_head extent_list;           /* lru list for shrinker */
> >>    spinlock_t extent_lock;                 /* locking extent lru list */
> >>    atomic_t total_ext_tree;                /* extent tree count */
> >> +  atomic_t total_zombie_tree;             /* extent zombie tree count */
> >>    atomic_t total_ext_node;                /* extent info count */
> >>
> >>    /* basic filesystem units */
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> >> index a11e099..93606f2 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> >> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct 
> >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>
> >>   static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>   {
> >> -  return atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) +
> >> +  return atomic_read(&sbi->total_zombie_tree) +
> >>                            atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> >>   }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.5.4 (Apple Git-61)
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> > .
> >


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to