Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2015 5:52 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: avoid f2fs_lock_op in
> f2fs_write_begin
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:33:50PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 01:50:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:15 AM
> > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > > > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: avoid f2fs_lock_op in
> > > > f2fs_write_begin
> > > >
> > > > If f2fs_write_begin is to update data, we can bypass calling
> > > > f2fs_lock_op() in
> > > > order to avoid the checkpoint latency in the write syscall.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/f2fs/data.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > index 49092da..d53cf4f 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > @@ -1418,10 +1418,16 @@ static int prepare_write_begin(struct
> > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > pgoff_t index = page->index;
> > > > struct dnode_of_data dn;
> > > > struct page *ipage;
> > > > + bool locked = false;
> > > > + struct extent_info ei;
> > > > int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> > > > -
> > > > + if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) ||
> > > > + (pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK) >= i_size_read(inode)) {
> > > > + f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> > > > + locked = true;
> > > > + }
> > > > +restart:
> > > > /* check inline_data */
> > > > ipage = get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(ipage)) {
> > > > @@ -1436,22 +1442,41 @@ static int prepare_write_begin(struct
> > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > read_inline_data(page, ipage);
> > > > set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_DATA_EXIST);
> > > > sync_inode_page(&dn);
> > > > - goto done;
> > > > } else {
> > > > err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > - goto err_out;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + err = f2fs_get_block(&dn, index);
> > >
> > > Seems after f2fs_convert_inline_page, data_blkaddr and node_changed should
> > > have been set, so f2fs_get_block could be removed here.
> >
> > I don't think so. The inline_data treats with 0'th index only.
> > In order to handle non-zero index, we should do f2fs_get_block.
non-zero index page should have been handled before grab_cache_page_write_begin.
We won't encounter such case here.
> > Oh, if you meant zero index case only, we can do that like this.
> >
> > if (index)
> > err = f2fs_get_block();
>
> Actually, we need
> if (index || !dn.data_blkaddr)
> err = f2fs_get_block();
>
> Since f2fs_convert_inline_page can return right away, if there is
> no data in inline_data space.
Yes, that's the case we should handle. :)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > >
> > > > + }
> > > > + } else if (locked) {
> > > > + err = f2fs_get_block(&dn, index);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, index, &ei)) {
> > > > + dn.data_blkaddr = ei.blk + index - ei.fofs;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + bool restart = false;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* hole case */
> > > > + err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, index,
> > > > LOOKUP_NODE);
> > >
> > > Better to handle error case like -ENOMEM or -EIO.
> >
> > I think we can just give another chance at this moment and let
> > f2fs_get_block()
> > handle that in the next round.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > > + if (err || (!err && dn.data_blkaddr ==
> > > > NULL_ADDR))
> > > > + restart = true;
> > > > + if (restart) {
> > > > + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > > > + f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> > > > + locked = true;
> > > > + goto restart;
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > - err = f2fs_get_block(&dn, index);
> > > > -done:
> > > > +
> > > > /* convert_inline_page can make node_changed */
> > > > *blk_addr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> > > > *node_changed = dn.node_changed;
> > > > -err_out:
> > > > +out:
> > > > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> > > > unlock_out:
> > > > - f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> > > > + if (locked)
> > > > + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> > > > return err;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1488,7 +1513,7 @@ repeat:
> > > >
> > > > *pagep = page;
> > > >
> > > > - err = prepare_write_begin(sbi, page, pos + len,
> > > > + err = prepare_write_begin(sbi, page, pos, len,
> > > > &blkaddr, &need_balance);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > goto fail;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.5.4 (Apple Git-61)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
