On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:50:07PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > Martin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [...] > > > > * Red Hat "2.96" or CVS 2.97 will probably break any known kernel. > > > Works fine for me and 2.4.0-test10-pre5... however there are tons of > > preprocessor warnings in some drivers. > > CVS (from 20001028 or so) gave a 2.4.0.10.6/i686 that crashed on boot, no > time to dig deeper yet. CVS 2.97 is known to miscompile e.g. buffer.c. Jakub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) Keith Owens
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous r... Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuito... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus grat... Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous r... Rusty Russell
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuito... Peter Samuelson
- Recommended compiler? - Re: [patch] ke... Linux Kernel Developer
- Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [p... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [p... Martin Dalecki
- Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [p... Horst von Brand
- Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [p... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [p... Martin Dalecki