On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>  void init_irq_alloc_info(struct irq_alloc_info *info,
> @@ -279,18 +272,21 @@ static void x86_vector_free_irqs(struct irq_domain 
> *domain,
>                                unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
>  {
>       struct irq_data *irq_data;
> +     unsigned long flags;
>       int i;
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
>               irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(x86_vector_domain, virq + i);
>               if (irq_data && irq_data->chip_data) {
> +                     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
>                       clear_irq_vector(virq + i, irq_data->chip_data);
>                       free_apic_chip_data(irq_data->chip_data);
> +                     irq_domain_reset_irq_data(irq_data);
> +                     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);

We really do not need to free stuff under the vector lock.

   lock();
   data = irq_data->chip_data;
   irq_domain_reset_irq_data(irq_data);
   unlock();
   free_apic_chip_data(data);

Hmm?    

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to