Hi Milo,

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:28:25 +0900
Milo Kim <milo....@ti.com> wrote:

> Atmel AIC has common structure for SMR (Source Mode Register).
> 
>   bit[6:5] Interrupt source type
>   bit[2:0] Priority level
>   Other bits are unused.
> 
> To update new priority value, bit[2:0] should be cleared first and then
> new priority level can be written. However, aic_common_set_priority()
> helper clears source type bits instead of priority bits.
> This patch fixes wrong mask bit operation.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <milo....@ti.com>

Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>

Can you also add

Fixes: b1479ebb7720 ("irqchip: atmel-aic: Add atmel AIC/AIC5 drivers")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #v3.17+

Thanks,

Boris

> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c
> index b12a5d5..37199b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic-common.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int aic_common_set_priority(int priority, unsigned *val)
>           priority > AT91_AIC_IRQ_MAX_PRIORITY)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     *val &= AT91_AIC_PRIOR;
> +     *val &= ~AT91_AIC_PRIOR;
>       *val |= priority;
>  
>       return 0;



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to