On 20/12/15 22:12, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.4-rc5]
[also build test ERROR on next-20151218]
[cannot apply to tip/irq/core]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Thompson/irq-arm-Use-FIQ-for-NMI-backtrace-when-possible/20151221-045854
config: arm-iop-adma (attached as .config)
reproduce:
wget
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c: In function 'handle_fiq_as_nmi':
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:489:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'handle_arch_irq' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
handle_arch_irq(regs);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Thanks. I'll look at this.
vim +/handle_arch_irq +489 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
483 * Either the interrupt controller supports FIQ, meaning it will
484 * do the right thing with this call, or we will end up
treating a
485 * spurious FIQ (which is normally fatal) as though it were an
IRQ
486 * which, although it risks deadlock, still gives us a sporting
487 * chance of surviving long enough to log errors.
488 */
> 489 handle_arch_irq(regs);
490
491 nmi_exit();
492
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
