> Static vs dynamic matters for whether it's an AGGREGATE work. Clearly, > static linking aggregates the library with the other program in the same > binary. There's no question about that. And that _does_ have meaning from > a copyright law angle, since if you don't have permission to ship > aggregate works under the license, then you can't ship said binary. It's > just a non-issue in the specific case of the GPLv2.
The right to ship aggregate works is not one specifically reserved by law to the copyright holder. It's also not clear that an aggregate work is in fact a single work for any legal purpose other than the aggregator's claim to copyright. All you need to ship an aggregated work is the right to ship each of the individual works aggregated in it. For GPL'd works, you get that right from first sale, assuming you lawfully acquired the GPL'd work in the first place. If the aggregation is performed in an automated and mechanized way, the aggregate is not a single work. It's still multiple works aggregated together. For copyright law purposes, it is not a work because no creative input was needed to produce it beyond what was used to create the works from which it was formed. I recently bought two DVDs as a present for a friend of mine. I put the two DVDs in one box and shipped them to him. Just because the two DVDs are in one box does not make them a derivative work for copyright purposes because no creative input went in to them. I can even staple the two DVDs together if I want. I also don't need any special permission to ship the two of them together to my friend, first sale covers that. The right to ship each individual work is all that's needed to ship the aggregate. Now, if I wanted to write my own story with elements from the content of both DVDs, that would be a derivative work because the combination itself is done in a creative way. No automated, mechanical process can create a derivative work of software. (With a few exceptions not relevant here.) DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
