Hi all,

When I setup two zones (NORMAL and DMA) in my system, I got the
following wired result from /proc/buddyinfo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
root:~> cat /proc/buddyinfo
Node 0, zone      DMA      2      1      2      1      1      0      0
    1      1      2      2      0      0      0
Node 0, zone   Normal      1      1      1      1      1      1      0
    0 4294967295      0 4294967295      2      0      0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you see, two area->nr_free went -1.

After dig into the code, I found the problem is in the fun
__free_one_page() when the kernel boot up call free_all_bootmem(). If
two zones setup, it's possible NORMAL zone merged a block whose order
=8 at the first time(this time zone[NORMA]->free_area[8].nr_free = 0)
and found its buddy in the DMA zone. So the two blocks will be merged
and area->nr_free went to -1.

My proposed patch is as follows:


Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- page_alloc.c.orig   2006-12-19 10:45:25.000000000 +0800
+++ page_alloc.c        2006-12-19 10:44:48.000000000 +0800
@@ -407,7 +407,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struc

                list_del(&buddy->lru);
                area = zone->free_area + order;
-               area->nr_free--;
+               if (area->nr_free > 0)
+                       area->nr_free--;
                rmv_page_order(buddy);
                combined_idx = __find_combined_index(page_idx, order);
                page = page + (combined_idx - page_idx);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any comments?

Thanks,
-Aubrey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to