On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > > We never want to drop dirty data! (ignoring the truncate case, which is > handled privately by truncate anyway)
Bzzt. SURE we do. We absolutely do want to drop dirty data in the writeout path. How do you think dirty data ever _becomes_ clean data? In other words, yes, we _do_ want to test-and-clear all the pgtable bits _and_ the PG_dirty bit. We want to do it for: - writeout - truncate - possibly a "drop" event (which could be a case for a journal entry that becomes stale due to being replaced or something - kind of "truncate" on metadata) because both of those events _literally_ turn dirty state into clean state. In no other circumstance do we ever want to clear a dirty bit, as far as I can tell. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/