Hi Tigran,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:04:39 +0000 (GMT), Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Ok, your patch is correct, although I assume you realize that it does
> nothing --- both the function and the data it operates on are inside
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and checking include/linux/init.h I see that
> __cpuinitdata is nothing in this case. E.g. msr_class_cpu_notifier in the
> msr driver isn't declared __cpuinitdata...
I don't see anything in arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c depending on
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU (in 2.6.20-rc1), sorry.
> But to tidy up one should add __cpuinitdata as you suggest (to guard for
> the case if these two slip out of CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, although they are
> meaningless if cpu hotplug support is not configured in).
>
> Kind regards
> Tigran
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > Structure mc_cpu_notifier references a __cpuinit function, but
> > isn't declared __cpuinitdata itself:
> >
> > WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/microcode.o - Section mismatch: reference
> > to .init.text: from .data after 'mc_cpu_notifier' (at offset 0x118)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c 2006-12-15
> > 09:05:20.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/i386/kernel/microcode.c 2006-12-17
> > 15:23:40.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@
> > return NOTIFY_OK;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct notifier_block mc_cpu_notifier = {
> > +static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata mc_cpu_notifier = {
> > .notifier_call = mc_cpu_callback,
> > };
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
