Hi Boris,

Thanks a lot for your comments.

On 01/04/2016 06:02 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Milo,

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:28:24 +0900
Milo Kim <milo....@ti.com> wrote:

This patch-set provides unified Atmel AIC (Advanced Interrupt Controller)
driver. Currently, there are two AIC drivers, AIC and AIC5.
Each driver consists of chip specific part (irq-atmel-aic.o or
irq-atmel-aic5.o) and shared code (irq-atmel-aic-common.o).
But consolidated AIC driver is just one file driver which supports both
IRQ chip systems.

Sorry, but what's the real motivation behind this rework?

During my driver development on Atmel boards, I just found major difference between two IRQ chips is how to select HW IRQ number. Other parts could be merged into single driver like OMAP.



How to handle two IRQ chips in one driver
-----------------------------------------
   Structure aic_reg_offset is used for device configuration.
   AIC5 IRQ chip uses SSR (Source Select Register) to select IRQ number.
   On the other hand, AIC IRQ chip has simple register access.
   To support both IRQ chips, aic_is_ssr_used() helper is used.

Patches
-------
   1 ~  5: fix IRQ priority issue, clean up RTC/RTT fixup code and etc.

As explained in my review, those irq fixup are essential, and cannot
remove them.

My apologies for this regression. I should check your log carefully. Thanks for pointing this out. I'm just thinking about boot code modification for this. How about supporting RTC/RTT fixup code in at91bootstrap?


   6 ~ 19: create unified IRQ chip operation with aic_reg_offset data.

I started to review those patches, but honestly I don't see the point of
this rework, since you're trying to merge drivers for 2 IPs that are
completely different from a functional POV (except for a few tiny things
like priority or irq type definition).

Before reviewing the remaining patches, I'd like to know more about your
real motivations for pushing those changes?

Yeap, thanks for your time. My idea is simple.

"Different IRQ chip operation can be consolidated if simple data structure is used."

If AIC and AIC5 must be separate, then I'll try to rework irq-atmel-common part.



Target boards
-------------
   Tested with two boards.
   * Arietta G25 (SoC: AT91SAM9G25)
   * Xplained board (SoC: SAMA5D3)

Number of driver files
----------------------
   AIC:              3 (irq-atmel-aic.c, irq-atmel-aic-common.c and h)
   AIC5:             3 (irq-atmel-aic5.c, irq-atmel-aic-common.c and h)
   Consolidated AIC: 1 (irq-aic.c)

Code size
---------
   AIC (irq-atmel-aic.o and irq-atmel-aic-common.o)
     text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
     5137           196       4    5337    14d9 drivers/irqchip/built-in.o

   AIC5 (irq-atmel-aic5.o and irq-atmel-aic-common.o)
     text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
     5548           196       4    5748    1674 drivers/irqchip/built-in.o

   Consolidated AIC (irq-aic.o)
     text          data     bss     dec     hex filename
     4841           196       8    5045    13b5 drivers/irqchip/built-in.o

Lines of code
-------------
   AIC:              597
   AIC5:             688
   Consolidated AIC: 609


Please, redo the same thing, but after keeping the IRQ fixup stuff, and
I'm pretty sure the text section of the AIC/AIC5 and the consolidated
version will be much closer.

Let me check it later if I could have a chance to create the 2nd patch ;)

Best regards,
Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to