On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mateusz Guzik <mgu...@redhat.com> wrote: > The code was taking the semaphore for reading, which does not protect > against readers nor concurrent modifications.
(down/up)_read does not protect against concurrent readers ? > > The problem could cause a sanity checks to fail in procfs's cmdline > reader, resulting in an OOPS. > Can you explain this a bit and may be give some examples ? > Note that some functions perform an unlocked read of various mm fields, > but they seem to be fine despite possible modificaton. Those need to be fixed as well ? > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mgu...@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
