* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> An updated patch is below. I also have boot tested it. Andrew, Linus, 
> please apply.

this patch introduced a locking bug, which is fixed by the delta patch 
below.

        Ingo

------------------------>
Subject: [patch] lockdep: more unlock-on-error fixes, fix
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

my __acquire_lock() cleanup introduced a locking bug: on SMP
systems we'd release a non-owned graph lock. Fix this by
moving the graph unlock back, and by leaving the max_lockdep_depth
variable update possibly racy. (we dont care, it's just statistics)

also add some minimal debugging code to graph_unlock()/graph_lock(), 
which caught this locking bug.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 kernel/lockdep.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ static int graph_lock(void)
 
 static inline int graph_unlock(void)
 {
+       if (debug_locks && !__raw_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock))
+               return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
+
        __raw_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
        return 0;
 }
@@ -716,6 +719,9 @@ find_usage_backwards(struct lock_class *
        struct lock_list *entry;
        int ret;
 
+       if (!__raw_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock))
+               return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
+
        if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
                max_recursion_depth = depth;
        if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
@@ -2208,6 +2214,7 @@ out_calc_hash:
                if (!chain_head && ret != 2)
                        if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
                                return 0;
+               graph_unlock();
        } else
                /* after lookup_chain_cache(): */
                if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
@@ -2216,7 +2223,7 @@ out_calc_hash:
        curr->lockdep_depth++;
        check_chain_key(curr);
        if (unlikely(curr->lockdep_depth >= MAX_LOCK_DEPTH)) {
-               debug_locks_off_graph_unlock();
+               debug_locks_off();
                printk("BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!\n");
                printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
                return 0;
@@ -2225,7 +2232,6 @@ out_calc_hash:
        if (unlikely(curr->lockdep_depth > max_lockdep_depth))
                max_lockdep_depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 
-       graph_unlock();
        return 1;
 }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to