From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need this or not.
Protection Keys has relatively little code associated with it,
and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled. However,
I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being able to
disable it.
Here's the option if folks want it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
---
b/arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff -puN arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt arch/x86/Kconfig
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt 2016-01-06 15:50:13.114494312
-0800
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig 2016-01-06 15:50:13.117494447 -0800
@@ -1682,8 +1682,18 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
If unsure, say N.
config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+ prompt "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
def_bool y
+ # Note: only available in 64-bit mode
depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
+ ---help---
+ Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing
+ page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the
+ page tables when an application changes protection domains.
+
+ For details, see Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
+
+ If unsure, say y.
config EFI
bool "EFI runtime service support"
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
