On 01/21/2016 11:49 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
stacktool reports the following false positive warnings:
stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x5c: sibling call from
callable instruction with changed frame pointer
stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x60: function has
unreachable instruction
stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x64: function has
unreachable instruction
[...]
It's confused by the following dynamic jump instruction in
__bpf_prog_run()::
jmp *(%r12,%rax,8)
which corresponds to the following line in the C code:
goto *jumptable[insn->code];
There's no way for stacktool to deterministically find all possible
branch targets for a dynamic jump, so it can't verify this code.
In this case the jumps all stay within the function, and there's nothing
unusual going on related to the stack, so we can whitelist the function.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Fine by me:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
