David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET when used with ADJ_NANO.
I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced more unit tests to validate these going forward. Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent? Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window if you'd prefer. Let me know if you have any thoughts or objections! thanks -john Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com> Cc: Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com> Cc: Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com> John Stultz (2): ntp: Fix ADJ_SETOFFSET being used w/ ADJ_NANO kselftests: timers: Add adjtimex SETOFFSET validity tests kernel/time/ntp.c | 14 ++- tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1
