On 22.01.2016 05:23, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The function is always returning zero even in case of failures since
> the ret value was not propagated to the callers. Fix the error path.
> 
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> index 7184a0eda793..6653c3d11b66 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, 
> struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>  
>  out:
>       mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>

Tested on Trats2 board with max77686:
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to