On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 16:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Pls test.

Is good. Only s390 remains a question.

Another point, change_protection() also does a cache flush, should we
too?

> ----
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index d8a842a..eec8706 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -448,9 +448,10 @@ static int page_mkclean_one(struct page *page, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma)
>               goto unlock;
>  
>       entry = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pte);
          flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(entry));
> +     flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
>       entry = pte_mkclean(entry);
>       entry = pte_wrprotect(entry);
> -     ptep_establish(vma, address, pte, entry);
> +     set_pte_at(mm, address, pte, entry);
>       lazy_mmu_prot_update(entry);
>       ret = 1;
>  
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to