Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 
> > Ya know, sorting those lists causes this problem, too...  usb.o is
> > listed first in the various lists, as is usbcore.o.  Is it possible to
> > avoid sorting?  Doing so will fix this, and also any other link order
> > breakage like this that exists, too.
> 
> This is the right fix. We MUST NOT sort those things.
> 
> The only reason for sorting is apparently to remove the "multi-objs"
> things, and replace them with the object files they are composed of.

No. It is NOT the only reason. 

Some driver have a "lowerlevel" driver that needs to be included or
can be loaded as a module whenever the driver is enabled.

This happens to be the case with sx, rio and generic_serial. So both
SX and RIO, when enabled pull in generic_serial, which gets sorted out
by the sort-and-uniqify. 

I used to have horrendously complicated Makefile rules to get this
right, but this was simplified enormously by the "eliminate duplicate 
objects" that is now in the Makefiles. 

                        Roger. 

-- 
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
*       Common sense is the collection of                                *
******  prejudices acquired by age eighteen.   -- Albert Einstein ********
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to