On 25-01-16, 15:16, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
> policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
> primitive instead.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
> do {
> - policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> -
> /* No more policies in the list */
> - if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
> + if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
> return NULL;
> +
> + policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
>
> return policy;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
viresh
