On 23.01.16 17:39:20, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f7f7533
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c

> +/* Callback for parsing of the Proximity Domain <-> Memory Area mappings */
> +int __init acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
> +{
> +     u64 start, end;
> +     int node, pxm;
> +
> +     if (srat_disabled())
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (ma->header.length != sizeof(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity)) {

Must be:

        ma->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity)) {

Allow extensions to struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity in newer versions.

> +             bad_srat();
> +             return -EINVAL;

We need a pr_err() here to avoid that numa setup fails silently due to
bad fw. This applies to all error paths.

See my delta patch below. You can merge it with your patch.

-Robert

> +     }


>From 78945c73e4ec03756a135a75133ed29694a7a0f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Richter <rrich...@cavium.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:53:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64, acpi, numa: Add error messages for bad SRAT tables

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrich...@cavium.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index f7f7533761cd..936ad6c43740 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct 
acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
                return;
 
        if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity)) {
+               pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n",
+                       pa->header.length);
                bad_srat();
                return;
        }
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct 
acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
        }
 
        if (get_mpidr_in_madt(pa->acpi_processor_uid, &mpidr)) {
-               pr_warn("SRAT: PXM %d with ACPI ID %d has no valid MPIDR in 
MADT\n",
+               pr_err("SRAT: PXM %d with ACPI ID %d has no valid MPIDR in 
MADT\n",
                        pxm, pa->acpi_processor_uid);
                bad_srat();
                return;
@@ -190,7 +192,9 @@ int __init acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct 
acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
        if (srat_disabled())
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       if (ma->header.length != sizeof(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity)) {
+       if (ma->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity)) {
+               pr_err("SRAT: Unexpected header length: %d\n",
+                       ma->header.length);
                bad_srat();
                return -EINVAL;
        }
@@ -216,10 +220,17 @@ int __init acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct 
acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
                (unsigned long long) start, (unsigned long long) end - 1);
 
        if (numa_add_memblk(node, start, (end - start)) < 0) {
+               pr_err("SRAT: Failed to add memblk to node %u [mem 
%#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+                       node, (unsigned long long) start,
+                       (unsigned long long) end - 1);
                bad_srat();
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
+       pr_info("SRAT: Node %u PXM %u [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+               node, pxm,
+               (unsigned long long) start, (unsigned long long) end - 1);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.0.rc3

Reply via email to