On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:06:11 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-01-16, 12:02, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last > > policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last > > primitive instead. > > > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <[email protected]> > > --- > > The earlier version one was based on an Juri's experimental branch. > > I have based this one on linux-pm.git linux-next branch. > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > index c35e7da..e979ec7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct > > cpufreq_policy *policy, > > bool active) > > { > > do { > > - policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); > > - > > /* No more policies in the list */ > > - if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list) > > + if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list)) > > return NULL; > > + > > + policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); > > } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active)); > > > > return policy; > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks! Rafael
