On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:57:43AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:19:58PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 04:43:05AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > - if (run == 0 || ena == 0) {
> > > > > - fprintf(output, "CPU%*d%s%*s%s",
> > > > > - csv_output ? 0 : -4,
> > > > > - perf_evsel__cpus(counter)->map[cpu],
> > > > > csv_sep,
> > > > > - csv_output ? 0 : 18,
> > > > > - counter->supported ? CNTR_NOT_COUNTED :
> > > > > CNTR_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> > > > > - csv_sep);
> > > >
> > > > this hunk is not preserved in the new code.. I guess the output is
> > > > different for -A if counter wasn't meassure?
> > >
> > > The code for this is common in printout() now.
> >
> > but what will be printed for -A not counted counters?
> > not the "CPU%*d%s%*s%s" ...
>
>
> CPU0 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU1 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU2 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU3 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU4 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU5 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU6 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU7 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU8 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU9 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU10 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
> CPU11 <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
>
ah the aggr_printout provides that now.. which wasn't
the case for the removed code
thanks,
jirka
