Hi Thomas,

Thanks for taking a look at this.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:45:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:

For shared interrupts, if one requester passes in any IRQF_TRIGGER_*
flags whilst another doesn't, __setup_irq() can erroneously fail.

The no-flags case should be treated as "already configured", so change
__setup_irq() to only check that the flags match if any have been
provided.

What happens if that "already configured", i.e. the default setting, is
conflicting with the newly requested interrupt?

I rather prefer the failure than the resulting silent wreckage.


Yes, I agree that would be best avoided. It seems to me that this case
is actually handled a bit lower down:

        } else if (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) {
                unsigned int nmsk = new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
                unsigned int omsk = irq_settings_get_trigger_mask(desc);

                if (nmsk != omsk)
                        /* hope the handler works with current  trigger mode */
                        pr_warning("irq %d uses trigger mode %u; requested 
%u\n",
                                   irq, nmsk, omsk);
        }

Perhaps that should be louder/fatal?

Best regards,

-Brian

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to