On 28/01/2016 02:51, Wu, Feng wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:59 AM >> To: Wu, Feng <feng...@intel.com> >> Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest- >> priority interrupts >> >> 2016-01-25 16:53+0800, Feng Wu: >>> Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts, As an >>> example, modern Intel CPUs in server platform use this method to >>> handle lowest-priority interrupts. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng...@intel.com> >>> --- >> >> With any proposed resolution of BUG_ON in kvm_vector_to_index, >> >> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> >> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >>> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | >> S_IWUSR); >>> +bool __read_mostly vector_hashing = true; >> >> (Module param can be static.) >> >>> +module_param(vector_hashing, bool, S_IRUGO); > > Thanks a lot for your comments, Radim & Paolo! > > Paolo, given that the only two comments above, do I need to send v5? Or > you can handle it while merging them? I am fine with both methods.
It's fine, I'm merging it. Paolo
