On 26 January 2016 at 03:15, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/2016 10:51 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 22 January 2016 at 04:32, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>> This patch enables mmc hosts to suspend/resume asynchronously.
>>> This will improve system suspend/resume speed. After applying
>>> this patch and enabling all mmc hosts' child devices to
>>> suspend/resume asynchronously on ASUS T100TA, the system
>>> suspend-to-idle time is reduced from 1645ms to 1107ms, and the
>>> system resume time is reduced from 940ms to 914ms.
>> Do you really reduce time at all with this patch by its own? I think not.
>>
>> Moreover, I thought the biggest improvement came from the patch which
>> enabled async suspend/resume for the MMC/SD/SDIO device?
>> ec076cd226c3 ("mmc: enable MMC/SD/SDIO device to suspend/resume
>> asynchronously")
>>
>> Similar comment applies to patch2/2, but I would expect it together
>> with the $subject patch gives an improvement.
>>
>> Please update the change-logs one more round.
>
> The reduce time is not contributed by only this patch, please see the
> change-log: "After applying this patch and enabling all mmc hosts' child
> devices to suspend/resume asynchronously on ASUS T100TA .......". Actually,
> the biggest improvement came from the patch - "net/wireless: enable wiphy
> device to suspend/resume asynchronously(commit
> 9f0e13546ef5773b7059b531a667ec47a5f897ee)". Wiphy device(phy0) is child
> device of WiFi card(SDIO card).
>
> Do you mean that I should list the reduce time contributed by only this patch
> and patch2/2 in change-log?
Okay, fair enough. I should have read the change log a bit more detailed.
Let's keep this as is! I have applied both patch 1 and patch2.
Adrian, please tell me if you don't like patch2 (sdhci-acpi), then I
will drop it.
Thanks and kind regards
Uffe
