On 12/28, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Now, the clock parent is not "struct clk *", but "struct clk_core *". > Of course, the size of a pointer is always same, but strictly speaking, > sizeof(struct clk *) should be sizeof(struct clk_core *) here. > > This mismatch happened when we split the structure into struct clk > and struct clk_core. For the potential possibility of future renaming, > sizeof(*core->parents) would be better. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> > ---
Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
