On 01-02-16, 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "the sysfs lock" here? The policy rwsem > or something else?
He perhaps referred to the s_active.lock that we see in traces. -- viresh
On 01-02-16, 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "the sysfs lock" here? The policy rwsem > or something else?
He perhaps referred to the s_active.lock that we see in traces. -- viresh