On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:10:19PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Sequence vma_lock_anon_vma() - vma_unlock_anon_vma() isn't safe if
> anon_vma appeared between lock and unlock. We have to check anon_vma
> first or call anon_vma_prepare() to be sure that it's here. There are
> only few users of these legacy helpers. Let's get rid of them.
> 
> This patch fixes anon_vma lock imbalance in validate_mm().
> Write lock isn't required here, read lock is enough.
> 
> And reorders expand_downwards/expand_upwards: security_mmap_addr() and
> wrapping-around check don't have to be under anon vma lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
> Link: 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+Y908EjM2z=706dv4rv6dwtxtlk9nfg9_7dhrmlppb...@mail.gmail.com

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply via email to