On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 15:45 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Wei Tang <[email protected]> wrote: [] > > > WARNING: sizeof sig->rlim should be sizeof(sig->rlim) [] > > If anyone feels strongly about accepting such patches, then the right > > solution is > > to create a Coccinelle semantic patch to run over the whole kernel and get > > over > > with the churn once and for all. > > That, or a single patch taking that piece of idiocy out of checkpatch.pl...
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/11/103
