Salut, On 02/02/16 18:02, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:27PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: >> clk_register_mux returns a pointer wrapped error value in case of >> failure, so a simple NULL check is not sufficient to catch errors. >> Fix that and elaborate on the failure reason on the way. The whole >> function does not return any error value, so silently failing may >> leave users scratching their heads because the kernel does not >> provide any clues on what's wrong. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > > Applied, thanks. > > Any chance you do that for the other functions? :)
Sure, that was actually a test balloon ;-) Cheers, Andre
