On 02/04/2016 05:17 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com> >> wrote:
>>> Hopefully, once the problem with the bad stacktraces are fixed, the >>> actual circular lock dependencies will be clear. > Found a bug in lockdep. Yes, the first stack is correct, and the saved > stack is just a random, unrelated stack. Will mail a fix. Ok, so with the lockdep bug fixed, those reports should now have the correct stack traces. I'd appreciate if you could re-generate the original report, so I can examine if my speculative fix was appropriate. And then if you would re-generate the more recent report, I'll relook at that. Regards, Peter Hurley