* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:50 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Robert Crocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
> > > >fixed yet, and it's been around for some time.
> > >
> > > Is there anything you would like me to do to help diagnose this?
> >
> > to figure out what the bug is :-/ Below is the tasklet redesign patch -
> > the bug must be in there somewhere.
>
> > +static inline int tasklet_tryunlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> > +{
> > + return cmpxchg(&t->state, TASKLET_STATEF_RUN, 0) == TASKLET_STATEF_RUN;
> > +}
> > +
>
> This probably isn't it, but is cmpxchg available on all archs now?
yeah, it's probably not related, i saw these failures on plain i686 too,
which definitely has cmpxchg support. The failures i saw happened on a
hyperthreading CPU, so i guess it must be some sort of narrow race.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
