Hi On 5 February 2016 at 00:46, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > On 02/04/2016 08:37 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: >> >> Will Deacon wrote: >>>> >>>> +static int sbsa_gwdt_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd) >>>> >+{ >>>> >+ struct sbsa_gwdt *gwdt = to_sbsa_gwdt(wdd); >>>> >+ >>>> >+ /* >>>> >+ * Writing WRR for an explicit watchdog refresh. >>>> >+ * You can write anyting(like 0xc0ffee). >>>> >+ */ >>>> >+ writel(0xc0ffee, gwdt->refresh_base + SBSA_GWDT_WRR); >>>> >+ >>>> >+ return 0; >>>> >+} >>> >>> You might get in trouble for that. 0xd09f00d is probably less poisonous. >>> >>> http://www.petpoisonhelpline.com/poison/caffeine/ >> >> >> Any reason why we can't just keep it simple and write 0? > > > +1
yes, we can, just "0" would be fine, will do. Thanks :-) > > Guenter > -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021