No reason to use the double "if" nesting.  This fix allows to move
the nested block to the left and tidy up the error message without
80-col overflow.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---

 drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index bf49e44..3789a50 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -345,14 +345,14 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 
*ext_csd)
 
        /* Version is coded in the CSD_STRUCTURE byte in the EXT_CSD register */
        card->ext_csd.raw_ext_csd_structure = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_STRUCTURE];
-       if (card->csd.structure == 3) {
-               if (card->ext_csd.raw_ext_csd_structure > 2) {
-                       pr_err("%s: unrecognised EXT_CSD structure "
-                               "version %d\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
-                                       card->ext_csd.raw_ext_csd_structure);
-                       err = -EINVAL;
-                       goto out;
-               }
+
+       if (card->csd.structure == 3 &&
+           card->ext_csd.raw_ext_csd_structure > 2) {
+               pr_err("%s: unrecognised EXT_CSD structure version %d\n",
+                      mmc_hostname(card->host),
+                      card->ext_csd.raw_ext_csd_structure);
+               err = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;
        }
 
        np = mmc_of_find_child_device(card->host, 0);
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to