On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:45:14AM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:11:54AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> > @@ -33,10 +33,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_performance(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
> > -static
> > -#endif
> > -struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> > +static struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> > .name = "performance",
> > .governor = cpufreq_governor_performance,
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > @@ -52,6 +49,19 @@ static void __exit cpufreq_gov_performan
> > cpufreq_unregister_governor(&cpufreq_gov_performance);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE
> > +struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void)
> > +{
> > + return &cpufreq_gov_performance;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
>
> Shouldn't this be #ifdef ?
Never mind! Shouldn't be reviewing patches first thing in the morning!
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
