On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:48:30 +0000 Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:32:46PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:34:38 +0000 Russell King wrote: > > > The whole "all*config" idea on ARM is utterly useless - you can _not_ > > > get build coverage that way. > > > > Uh, can J. Random Developer submit patches to the ARM build system > > for testing? > > Given that it takes about 8 to 12 hours to do a build cycle, that's > not practical. The only real solution is for us to accept that > breakage will occur (and be prepared to keep a steady stream of > fixes heading into Linus' tree - which has been ruled out by Linus) > or J. Random Developer has to build a set of affected ARM defconfigs > themselves.
I guess I don't get it. Isn't that what we just went thru with the struct nightmare^W work_struct changes? But these header file changes are much simpler and more obvious... > Or alternatively the guy who's running kautobuild needs an amount of > rather powerful donated hardware to stubstantially increase it's > throughput. > > Or cross-gcc needs to be optimised to compile faster. > > I don't see any of the above happening, so... --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/