On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:31:38 -0500 Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:02:17 -0800 Sumant Patro wrote: > > > > See Documentation/SubmittingPatches: > > Please include output of "diffstat -p1 -w70" so that we can easily see > > the scope of the changes. > > > > and see Documentation/CodingStyle for comments below: > > > > > >> diff -uprN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c > >> linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c > >> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-28 > >> 09:56:04.000000000 -0800 > >> +++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-29 > >> 05:31:48.000000000 -0800 > >> @@ -779,6 +780,22 @@ megaraid_init_mbox(adapter_t *adapter) > >> goto out_release_regions; > >> } > >> > >> + // initialize the mutual exclusion lock for the mailbox > >> + spin_lock_init(&raid_dev->mailbox_lock); > > > > Linux uses /*...*/ C89-style comments, not // C99 comments. > > Randy > It is about time this absurd stipulation was dropped. > Are there any C compilers that can compile the linux > kernel and that don't accept both _standard_ comment styles?
It's not a technical issue, it's just a style point. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
