Hello Krzysztof,
On 02/14/2016 03:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 10.02.2016 o 03:30, Javier Martinez Canillas pisze:
All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
to a common dtsi that can be included by all the SoCs dtsi files.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
---
Hello,
The patch was tested on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook and an
Exynos5422 Odroid XU4 board. Reboot and poweroff worked for both.
But testing on Exynos3 and Exynos4 will be highly appreciated.
Would you be so kind and add my suggested-by (since it comes from
https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Exynos_Mainline_Kernel_TODO :) )
Right, sorry for missing that.
I'll test it on Exynos4 at work and then apply... but few comments below:
Best regards,
Javier
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 15 +--------------
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 15 +--------------
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 15 +--------------
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi | 15 +--------------
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2b8acf554881
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/*
+ * Samsung's Exynos SoC syscon reboot/poweroff nodes common definition.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+/ {
In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI.
some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version.
Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or
to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series?
+ poweroff: syscon-poweroff {
+ compatible = "syscon-poweroff";
+ regmap = <&pmu_system_controller>;
+ offset = <0x330C>; /* PS_HOLD_CONTROL */
+ mask = <0x5200>; /* reset value */
+ };
+
+ reboot: syscon-reboot {
+ compatible = "syscon-reboot";
+ regmap = <&pmu_system_controller>;
+ offset = <0x0400>; /* SWRESET */
+ mask = <0x1>;
+ };
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
index 18e3deffbf48..d9c221517935 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "skeleton.dtsi"
#include "exynos4-cpu-thermal.dtsi"
+#include "exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos3250.h>
/ {
@@ -152,20 +153,6 @@
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
};
- poweroff: syscon-poweroff {
- compatible = "syscon-poweroff";
- regmap = <&pmu_system_controller>;
- offset = <0x330C>; /* PS_HOLD_CONTROL */
- mask = <0x5200>; /* Reset value */
- };
-
- reboot: syscon-reboot {
- compatible = "syscon-reboot";
- regmap = <&pmu_system_controller>;
- offset = <0x0400>; /* SWRESET */
- mask = <0x1>;
- };
-
mipi_phy: video-phy@10020710 {
compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy";
#phy-cells = <1>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
index ca621a92319e..e6f6939ccdfa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos-audss-clk.h>
+#include "exynos-syscon-restart.dtsi"
Just to keep it consistent and logic - include after skeleton.
Ok, for include I usually try to keep alphabetically sorted but
I'll move it after skeleton if you prefer to keep it consistent.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America