On 16/02/2016 15:32, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 02/16/2016 01:22 PM, John Garry wrote:
When TRANS_TX_ERR_FRAME_TXED error occurs for
a command, the command should be re-attempted.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>
---
  drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c 
b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
index 58e1956..2bf93079b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c
@@ -1190,7 +1190,8 @@ static void sata_done_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba, 
struct sas_task *task,
  /* by default, task resp is complete */
  static void slot_err_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba,
                           struct sas_task *task,
-                          struct hisi_sas_slot *slot)
+                          struct hisi_sas_slot *slot,
+                          int *abort_slot)
  {
        struct task_status_struct *ts = &task->task_status;
        struct hisi_sas_err_record_v2 *err_record = slot->status_buffer;
@@ -1299,6 +1300,13 @@ static void slot_err_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba,
                        ts->stat = SAS_DATA_UNDERRUN;
                        break;
                }
+               case TRANS_TX_ERR_FRAME_TXED:
+               {
+                       /* This will request a retry */
+                       ts->stat = SAS_QUEUE_FULL;
+                       ++(*abort_slot);
+                       break;
+               }
                case TRANS_TX_OPEN_FAIL_WITH_IT_NEXUS_LOSS:
                case TRANS_TX_ERR_PHY_NOT_ENABLE:
                case TRANS_TX_OPEN_CNX_ERR_BY_OTHER:
@@ -1491,11 +1499,17 @@ slot_complete_v2_hw(struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba, struct 
hisi_sas_slot *slot,

        if ((complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_ERX_MSK) &&
                (!(complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_RSPNS_XFRD_MSK))) {
+               int abort_slot = 0;
                dev_dbg(dev, "%s slot %d has error info 0x%x\n",
                        __func__, slot->cmplt_queue_slot,
                        complete_hdr->dw0 & CMPLT_HDR_ERX_MSK);

-               slot_err_v2_hw(hisi_hba, task, slot);
+               slot_err_v2_hw(hisi_hba, task, slot, &abort_slot);
+               if (unlikely(abort_slot)) {
+                       queue_work(hisi_hba->wq, &slot->abort_slot);
+                       sts = ts->stat;
+                       goto out_1;
+               }
                goto out;
        }

Again this weird 'abort_slot' pointer reshuffling.
Care to clarify?

Cheers,

Hannes


Hopefully my explanation for patch #3 will help clarify here, as the code is functionally the same.

Thanks,
John



Reply via email to