On 18/02/16 12:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 18 February 2016 11:13:06 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 18/02/16 10:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 18 February 2016 10:11:37 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Right, I thought in a wrong way, in opposite it makes more sense now.
>>>>
>>>> .dtsi
>>>>
>>>> /* below the soc/ */
>>>> smb {
>>>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>>>> #address-cells = <2>;
>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> ranges = <0 0 0x40200000 0x10000>,
>>>> <1 0 0xa0000000 0x10000>;
>>>> };
>>>
>>> That looks good, yes.
>>>
>>> Is 0x10000 the correct maximum addressable size of the external bus
>>> in both cases?
>>>
>>> Intuitively, I would guess that the 0xa0000000 range might
>>> be much wider.
>>
>> There is only Ethernet connected to this bus (apart from PSRAM), so it
>> might be wider, but there is no indication of this in documentation.
>
> I see this called "ahb_to_extmem16" in the documentation, which indicates
> that it might be use 16 bits of address space, which would match
> the 64K you listed.
>
> For SSRAM1 / SSRAM2 / SSRAM3, a 8 MB address space is mentioned
> and 16 MB for external PSRAM at 0x21000000.
>
Right. I'll incorporate changes in the next version. Thanks for lessons
given and your time!
Cheers
Vladimir
> Arnd
>
>
>
>
