On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 21:01 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:57:05 +1100 > > > I like being able to have a simple way (ie. tar /proc/device-tree) to > > tell user to send me their DT and have in the end an exact binary > > representation so I can actually dig for problems, like a wrong phandle > > in an interrupt-map or stuff like that... > > "prtconf -pv" is what I'd ask the user to do on Sparc, or something > similar. > > In over 10 years of the sparc port there's never been a situation > where "prtconf -pv" or similar did not get me the information I > needed. :-) > > "prtconf" walks the device tree raw using /dev/openprom and > pretty prints it like I assume your ppc "lsprop" thing does.
Probably. The question now is that if we want to somewhat converge, what to do... either change sparc habits or change powerpc habits :-) I'll let that fight happen between you and paulus and watch while having a beer at LCA though :-) Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/